Does researching disfigurement risk perpetuating stigma?

Jane Frances is Policy Advisor in Education for Changing Faces. She is the author of Educating Children with Facial Disfigurement (London: Routledge/Falmer, 2004).

Does researching disfigurement risk perpetuating stigma? 

This chapter’s exploration of the relationship between facial disfigurement, stigma, and the work of research scholars and clinicians, has roots in Changing Faces (the UK-based charity working with and for people affected by disfigurement) where colleagues and clients often have unusual faces, and in psychoanalytic studies, where anything that is tacit, taken for granted, unspoken, unwitting, or unconscious is especially ripe for enquiry. The origin and usage of the term stigma is outlined, along with the mechanisms through which stigma is enacted, both consciously and unconsciously. This clarifies how the stigma associated with facial disfigurement allocates people whose appearance is unusual through whatever cause, to a homogenising, inferior category from which it is difficult to emerge as an individual who is not defined by the outward appearance of their face. Examples reflecting a great deal of already existing research and clinical writing are presented that reveal the prevalence of silence concerning other people’s reactions to persons whose facial appearance is disfigured. The change of perspective that has come with more recent campaigning, research and scholarship from within the disability rights movement is also considered: formerly unmentioned unpleasant and stigmatising reactions of others to a person’s disfigured face are now in the frame. It is argued that, unconsciously, these stigmatising or stigma-perpetuating responses, when unmentioned, are legitimised and perpetuated.

Keywords: stigma; psychoanalysis; unconscious bias; boundaries; exclusion; Changing Faces

Appearing in Approaches to Facial Difference: Past and Present (Bloomsbury: 2018). While you wait, check out other Changing Faces material on our blog.

This entry was posted in Changing Faces, Contemporary, Festival of Facialities, Psychology, Publications, Uncategorized and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Does researching disfigurement risk perpetuating stigma?

  1. Pingback: Does researching disfigurement risk perpetuating stigma? – bonniesmillar

  2. Pingback: How do children learn about facial disfigurement? | Effaced From History?

  3. Pingback: New Publication! Approaching Facial Difference: Past and Present | Effaced From History?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s